Productivity: how AI-ready are the leaders?
Workspace and collaboration apps used by teams of every size. We ran the LLMready crawler against each homepage and scored it the same way as a free audit.
70/100
Median (all industries: 77)
42%
Publish an llms.txt
83%
Allow all 4 core AI crawlers
50%
Use Schema.org JSON-LD
Key findings
- Asana leads with 82/100 (B-); Canva trails at 42.
- The productivity median is 7 points below the median of all 102 sites we measured.
- 2 of 12 block at least one core AI crawler (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot or Google-Extended) in robots.txt.
- 42% publish an llms.txt and 8% an llms-full.txt. 8% rely on JavaScript to render their main text.
- Weakest category on average: citation readiness at 61/100.
Bot access
76
Content extractability
67
Semantic metadata
75
Citation readiness
61
Scores
Leaderboard
| # | Site | Score | Bot access | Extractability | Metadata | Citation | Core bots | llms.txt | Biggest gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82 Asanaasana.com | 82 B- | 94 | 64 | 100 | 73 | Content density | ||
| 2 | 82 Notionnotion.com | 82 B- | 90 | 69 | 100 | 72 | Authorship and freshness | ||
| 3 | 80 monday.commonday.com | 80 B- | 94 | 64 | 97 | 64 | Authorship and freshness | ||
| 4 | 79 Slackslack.com | 79 C+ | 90 | 91 | 65 | 64 | Schema.org JSON-LD | ||
| 5 | 76 ClickUpclickup.com | 76 C | 96 | 74 | 62 | 66 | Authorship and freshness | ||
| 6 | 71 Zoomzoom.us | 71 C- | 76 | 49 | 100 | 62 | Content is in the initial HTML | ||
| 7 | 69 Airtableairtable.com | 69 D | 76 | 82 | 65 | 51 | llms.txt is present and valid | ||
| 8 | 69 Todoisttodoist.com | 69 D | 76 | 74 | 67 | 57 | llms.txt is present and valid | ||
| 9 | 67 Figmafigma.com | 67 D | 40 | 77 | 92 | 68 | 3 | llms.txt is present and valid | |
| 10 | 66 Miromiro.com | 66 D | 76 | 62 | 67 | 56 | llms.txt is present and valid | ||
| 11 | 57 Trellotrello.com | 57 F | 70 | 56 | 33 | 60 | llms.txt is present and valid | ||
| 12 | 42 Canvacanva.com | 42 F | 39 | 46 | 49 | 35 | 2 | llms.txt is present and valid |
Most common gaps
Where productivity sites lose points
Answer-ready formats
100%12 of 12 sites · Citation readiness
Add an FAQ section (with FAQPage schema) and question-style headings that mirror real queries.
Authorship and freshness
100%12 of 12 sites · Citation readiness
Show an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).
Content density
100%12 of 12 sites · Content extractability
Trim inline scripts, styles and markup bloat so text makes up a larger share of the page.
llms-full.txt is available
92%11 of 12 sites · Bot access
Publish the generated llms-full.txt alongside llms.txt.
llms.txt is present and valid
83%10 of 12 sites · Bot access
Generate an llms.txt below and upload it to your site root.
Markdown readability
67%8 of 12 sites · Content extractability
Where would your site rank?
Run the same audit on your site and compare it to the productivity median of 70.
A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked.