Is Figma AI-ready?
Not really.
Figma scores 67/100 for AI search readiness. Several gaps make it hard for AI engines to read, understand and quote this site.
Can AI crawlers get in?
What figma.com/robots.txt says to each crawler.
- GPTBotOpenAIBlocked
- PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowed
- ClaudeBotAnthropicBlocked
- Google-ExtendedGoogleBlocked
Key signals
What an answer engine finds on the homepage.
llms.txt
Not found
llms-full.txt
Not found
Sitemap
4,360 URLs
Schema.org JSON-LD
Organization, ContactPoint
Text in initial HTML
265 words
Response time
791 ms
Biggest wins
What Figma could fix first
- 1
llms.txt is present and valid
Bot access+5 pts possibleGenerate an llms.txt below and upload it to your site root.
- 2
GPTBot can crawl
Bot access+4 pts possibleAdd "User-agent: GPTBot" with "Allow: /" to robots.txt (and remove any matching Disallow rules).
- 3
ClaudeBot can crawl
Bot access+4 pts possibleAdd "User-agent: ClaudeBot" with "Allow: /" to robots.txt (and remove any matching Disallow rules).
- 4
Google-Extended can crawl
Bot access+4 pts possibleAdd "User-agent: Google-Extended" with "Allow: /" to robots.txt (and remove any matching Disallow rules).
- 5
Authorship and freshness
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleShow an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).
Every check
The full breakdown
Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.
Productivity ranking
Full benchmarkMedian 70/100 across 12 measured productivity sites (all sites: 77).
Similar scores elsewhere
Sites in other industries that landed close to 67.
How does your site compare to Figma?
Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. D is the bar to beat.