All payments made in the preview are in test mode. Read more
LLMready
wordpress.com · measured 28 October 2026

Is WordPress.com AI-ready?

Yes, mostly.

WordPress.com scores 85/100 for AI search readiness. AI crawlers can reach and read it, with a few gaps that are worth fixing.

#5 of 10 in website builders#19 of 102 sites measuredExactly at the industry median (85)
AI readiness0/ 100B
Bot access90
Content extractability82
Semantic metadata100
Citation readiness69

Can AI crawlers get in?

What wordpress.com/robots.txt says to each crawler.

  • GPTBotOpenAIAllowed
  • PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowed
  • ClaudeBotAnthropicAllowed
  • Google-ExtendedGoogleAllowed
OAI-SearchBotChatGPT-UserClaude-SearchBotApplebot-ExtendedCCBotMeta-ExternalAgentBytespider

Key signals

What an answer engine finds on the homepage.

llms.txt

Valid · 20 links

llms-full.txt

Not found

Sitemap

552 URLs

Schema.org JSON-LD

Organization, ImageObject, PostalAddress +6

Text in initial HTML

746 words

Response time

331 ms

Biggest wins

What WordPress.com could fix first

  1. 1

    Authorship and freshness

    Citation readiness+4 pts possible

    Show an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).

  2. 2

    Content density

    Content extractability+3 pts possible

    Trim inline scripts, styles and markup bloat so text makes up a larger share of the page.

  3. 3

    llms-full.txt is available

    Bot access+2 pts possible

    Publish the generated llms-full.txt alongside llms.txt.

  4. 4

    Answer-ready formats

    Citation readiness+2 pts possible

    Add an FAQ section (with FAQPage schema) and question-style headings that mirror real queries.

  5. 5

    Factual density

    Citation readiness+2 pts possible

    Include concrete numbers, prices, dates and stats — answer engines prefer quotable facts.

Every check

The full breakdown

Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.

Website builders ranking

Full benchmark

Median 85/100 across 10 measured website builders sites (all sites: 77).

1
90
Hostingerhostinger.comA-2
87
Shopifyshopify.comB+3
86
Squarespacesquarespace.comB4
85
Webflowwebflow.comB5
85
WordPress.comwordpress.comB6
84
Wixwix.comB7
83
Framerframer.comB8
77
Ghostghost.orgC+9
61
Carrdcarrd.coD10
57
Bubblebubble.ioF

Similar scores elsewhere

Sites in other industries that landed close to 85.

85
Courseracoursera.orgB
85
Hostelworldhostelworld.comB
85
HubSpothubspot.comB
85
Klaviyoklaviyo.comB
85
N26n26.comB
85
Stripestripe.comB
All 102 measured sites

How does your site compare to WordPress.com?

Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. B is the bar to beat.