Is Carrd AI-ready?
Not really.
Carrd scores 61/100 for AI search readiness. Several gaps make it hard for AI engines to read, understand and quote this site.
Can AI crawlers get in?
What carrd.co/robots.txt says to each crawler.
- GPTBotOpenAIAllowed
- PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowed
- ClaudeBotAnthropicAllowed
- Google-ExtendedGoogleAllowed
Key signals
What an answer engine finds on the homepage.
llms.txt
Not found
llms-full.txt
Not found
Sitemap
Not found
Schema.org JSON-LD
None
Text in initial HTML
244 words
Response time
92 ms
Biggest wins
What Carrd could fix first
- 1
llms.txt is present and valid
Bot access+5 pts possibleGenerate an llms.txt below and upload it to your site root.
- 2
Schema.org JSON-LD
Semantic metadata+4 pts possibleAdd Organization and WebSite JSON-LD (plus Product, Article or FAQPage where relevant).
- 3
Clear entity identity
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleAdd Organization JSON-LD with name, logo and sameAs links to your official profiles.
- 4
Authorship and freshness
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleShow an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).
- 5
Content is in the initial HTML
Content extractability+3 pts possibleAdd substantive, server-rendered copy that answers your visitors' key questions.
Every check
The full breakdown
Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.
Website builders ranking
Full benchmarkMedian 85/100 across 10 measured website builders sites (all sites: 77).
Similar scores elsewhere
Sites in other industries that landed close to 61.
How does your site compare to Carrd?
Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. D is the bar to beat.