All payments made in the preview are in test mode. Read more
LLMready
supabase.com · measured 28 October 2026

Is Supabase AI-ready?

Yes, mostly.

Supabase scores 87/100 for AI search readiness. AI crawlers can reach and read it, with a few gaps that are worth fixing.

#2 of 12 in developer tools#5 of 102 sites measured5 points above the industry median (82)
AI readiness0/ 100B+
Bot access100
Content extractability84
Semantic metadata100
Citation readiness64

Can AI crawlers get in?

What supabase.com/robots.txt says to each crawler.

  • GPTBotOpenAIAllowed
  • PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowed
  • ClaudeBotAnthropicAllowed
  • Google-ExtendedGoogleAllowed
OAI-SearchBotChatGPT-UserClaude-SearchBotApplebot-ExtendedCCBotMeta-ExternalAgentBytespider

Key signals

What an answer engine finds on the homepage.

llms.txt

Valid · 42 links

llms-full.txt

105 KB

Sitemap

3,252 URLs

Schema.org JSON-LD

Organization, ImageObject, ContactPoint +6

Text in initial HTML

1,061 words

Response time

128 ms

Biggest wins

What Supabase could fix first

  1. 1

    Authorship and freshness

    Citation readiness+4 pts possible

    Show an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).

  2. 2

    Content density

    Content extractability+3 pts possible

    Trim inline scripts, styles and markup bloat so text makes up a larger share of the page.

  3. 3

    Answer-ready formats

    Citation readiness+3 pts possible

    Add an FAQ section (with FAQPage schema) and question-style headings that mirror real queries.

  4. 4

    Clean heading hierarchy

    Content extractability+1 pts possible

    Use exactly one H1 and nest H2/H3 in order — models use headings to chunk your content.

  5. 5

    Factual density

    Citation readiness+1 pts possible

    Include concrete numbers, prices, dates and stats — answer engines prefer quotable facts.

Every check

The full breakdown

Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.

Developer tools ranking

Full benchmark

Median 82/100 across 12 measured developer tools sites (all sites: 77).

1
89
Netlifynetlify.comB+2
87
Supabasesupabase.comB+3
86
Postmanpostman.comB4
86
Renderrender.comB5
83
Dockerdocker.comB6
82
Sentrysentry.ioB-7
81
GitLabgitlab.comB-8
81
Vercelvercel.comB-9
78
GitHubgithub.comC+10
78
MongoDBmongodb.comC+11
77
Railwayrailway.appC+12
69
DigitalOceandigitalocean.comD

Similar scores elsewhere

Sites in other industries that landed close to 87.

87
Shopifyshopify.comB+
86
Bufferbuffer.comB
86
Jasperjasper.aiB
86
Mailchimpmailchimp.comB
86
Squarespacesquarespace.comB
85
Courseracoursera.orgB
All 102 measured sites

How does your site compare to Supabase?

Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. B+ is the bar to beat.