All payments made in the preview are in test mode. Read more
LLMready
github.com · measured 28 October 2026

Is GitHub AI-ready?

Partly.

GitHub scores 78/100 for AI search readiness. AI crawlers can reach it, but content or metadata gaps make it harder to understand and quote.

#9 of 12 in developer tools#44 of 102 sites measured4 points below the industry median (82)
AI readiness0/ 100C+
Bot access100
Content extractability77
Semantic metadata65
Citation readiness63

Can AI crawlers get in?

What github.com/robots.txt says to each crawler.

  • GPTBotOpenAIAllowed
  • PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowed
  • ClaudeBotAnthropicAllowed
  • Google-ExtendedGoogleAllowed
OAI-SearchBotChatGPT-UserClaude-SearchBotApplebot-ExtendedCCBotMeta-ExternalAgentBytespider

Key signals

What an answer engine finds on the homepage.

llms.txt

Valid · 117 links

llms-full.txt

28 KB

Sitemap

376 URLs

Schema.org JSON-LD

None

Text in initial HTML

814 words

Response time

60 ms

Biggest wins

What GitHub could fix first

  1. 1

    Schema.org JSON-LD

    Semantic metadata+4 pts possible

    Add Organization and WebSite JSON-LD (plus Product, Article or FAQPage where relevant).

  2. 2

    Clear entity identity

    Citation readiness+4 pts possible

    Add Organization JSON-LD with name, logo and sameAs links to your official profiles.

  3. 3

    Content density

    Content extractability+3 pts possible

    Trim inline scripts, styles and markup bloat so text makes up a larger share of the page.

  4. 4

    Markdown readability

    Content extractability+3 pts possible

    Shorten sentences and replace jargon; aim for a reading ease of 50+.

  5. 5

    Answer-ready formats

    Citation readiness+3 pts possible

    Add an FAQ section (with FAQPage schema) and question-style headings that mirror real queries.

Every check

The full breakdown

Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.

Developer tools ranking

Full benchmark

Median 82/100 across 12 measured developer tools sites (all sites: 77).

1
89
Netlifynetlify.comB+2
87
Supabasesupabase.comB+3
86
Postmanpostman.comB4
86
Renderrender.comB5
83
Dockerdocker.comB6
82
Sentrysentry.ioB-7
81
GitLabgitlab.comB-8
81
Vercelvercel.comB-9
78
GitHubgithub.comC+10
78
MongoDBmongodb.comC+11
77
Railwayrailway.appC+12
69
DigitalOceandigitalocean.comD

Similar scores elsewhere

Sites in other industries that landed close to 78.

78
Coherecohere.comC+
78
Headspaceheadspace.comC+
77
Ahrefsahrefs.comC+
79
edXedx.orgC+
77
Ghostghost.orgC+
79
Hootsuitehootsuite.comC+
All 102 measured sites

How does your site compare to GitHub?

Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. C+ is the bar to beat.