Is Runway AI-ready?
Yes, mostly.
Runway scores 82/100 for AI search readiness. AI crawlers can reach and read it, with a few gaps that are worth fixing.
Can AI crawlers get in?
What runwayml.com/robots.txt says to each crawler.
- GPTBotOpenAIAllowed
- PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowed
- ClaudeBotAnthropicAllowed
- Google-ExtendedGoogleAllowed
Key signals
What an answer engine finds on the homepage.
llms.txt
Valid · 61 links
llms-full.txt
Not found
Sitemap
362 URLs
Schema.org JSON-LD
Organization, Person, ContactPoint +2
Text in initial HTML
461 words
Response time
148 ms
Biggest wins
What Runway could fix first
- 1
Authorship and freshness
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleShow an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).
- 2
Answer-ready formats
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleAdd an FAQ section (with FAQPage schema) and question-style headings that mirror real queries.
- 3
Content density
Content extractability+3 pts possibleTrim inline scripts, styles and markup bloat so text makes up a larger share of the page.
- 4
llms-full.txt is available
Bot access+2 pts possiblePublish the generated llms-full.txt alongside llms.txt.
- 5
Markdown readability
Content extractability+1 pts possibleShorten sentences and replace jargon; aim for a reading ease of 50+.
Every check
The full breakdown
Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.
AI companies ranking
Full benchmarkMedian 73/100 across 10 measured ai companies sites (all sites: 77).
Similar scores elsewhere
Sites in other industries that landed close to 82.
How does your site compare to Runway?
Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. B- is the bar to beat.