Is MyFitnessPal AI-ready?
No.
MyFitnessPal scores 55/100 for AI search readiness. AI crawlers struggle to access or read this site in its current state.
Can AI crawlers get in?
What myfitnesspal.com/robots.txt says to each crawler.
- GPTBotOpenAIPartial
- PerplexityBotPerplexityPartial
- ClaudeBotAnthropicPartial
- Google-ExtendedGooglePartial
Key signals
What an answer engine finds on the homepage.
llms.txt
Not found
llms-full.txt
Not found
Sitemap
8 URLs
Schema.org JSON-LD
None
Text in initial HTML
1,327 words
Response time
986 ms
Biggest wins
What MyFitnessPal could fix first
- 1
llms.txt is present and valid
Bot access+5 pts possibleGenerate an llms.txt below and upload it to your site root.
- 2
Schema.org JSON-LD
Semantic metadata+4 pts possibleAdd Organization and WebSite JSON-LD (plus Product, Article or FAQPage where relevant).
- 3
Clear entity identity
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleAdd Organization JSON-LD with name, logo and sameAs links to your official profiles.
- 4
Authorship and freshness
Citation readiness+4 pts possibleShow an author and published/updated dates (in markup and JSON-LD).
- 5
Content density
Content extractability+3 pts possibleTrim inline scripts, styles and markup bloat so text makes up a larger share of the page.
Every check
The full breakdown
Snapshot of the homepage measured on 28 October 2026 with the same live crawl as the free LLMready audit. A high score means AI engines can reach, read and understand a site. It doesn't guarantee citations — those also depend on authority, relevance and the question being asked. Sites change — run a fresh audit for today's result.
Health and wellness ranking
Full benchmarkMedian 66/100 across 9 measured health and wellness sites (all sites: 77).
Similar scores elsewhere
Sites in other industries that landed close to 55.
How does your site compare to MyFitnessPal?
Get the same breakdown for your site — crawler access, extractability, metadata and citation readiness — plus a generated llms.txt. F is the bar to beat.